Key Takeaways
- AI can handle remote proctoring without a huge cost. Human monitoring gets expensive and complicated fast at scale.
- 360-Degree Monitoring Closes Cheating Loopholes. With multiple cameras, AI can see almost everything, making hidden notes or devices much harder to use than with a single webcam and a human proctor.
- Technology Has Come a Long Way. False positives are much less common in current AI platforms, especially those that introduce humans into the loop for ambiguous cases.
- Privacy Isn’t an Afterthought. Responsible AI proctoring platforms encrypt, minimize, and safely store data, and they clearly explain how it’s used.
- The combination of both is the sweet spot to use in practice. AI’s always-on vigilance and human judgment provide the most balanced, secure, and fair solution.
The real difference between AI-powered remote proctoring and traditional monitoring is basically who’s watching: humans, machines, or both?
Traditional monitoring is exactly what it sounds like: live human proctors watch candidates through a webcam during the exam. Sometimes it’s one proctor per student, sometimes one looking after a whole batch. They look for anything “off”—cheating, help from someone else, using a phone—except they do it entirely by eye, just like in a physical exam hall.
AI-powered remote proctoring platforms use algorithms instead. They analyze video, audio, and sometimes screen activity, and look for behaviors that signal cheating. For instance, the candidate wandering away from the screen, someone else popping into view, or the candidate using multiple devices. Many online exam platforms (including MeritTrac and other top educational assessment providers) combine both: the AI flags suspicious things, and human proctors step in to double-check, so you get the best of both worlds.
Now, let’s discuss the differences in both the practices for multiple steps of proctoring.
Accuracy, Mistakes, and That Dreaded “False Positive”
No proctoring system is perfect. Each comes with its own strengths and some frustrating quirks. You need to know in which platform there’ll be a requirement to reduce false positives.
Human Proctors: Sharp Eyes (with Limits)
Human judgment adds context. If a candidate fidgets, a person can usually tell nervousness from foul play. But proctors aren’t robots—they get tired, bored, distracted, even subconsciously biased. If one human is watching multiple students, it’s easy to overlook small signs or miss cheating. This leads to uneven monitoring, which can be unfair if the stakes are high.
AI Proctoring: Always On, Sometimes Overzealous
AI is like a never-tiring, multitasking observer. It tracks head turns, eye movements, background noises—the works—and does so for hundreds or thousands of students all at once. No bathroom breaks, no “I didn’t see that.” But it isn’t always perfect at understanding context. Early versions flagged false positives for things as simple as someone mumbling questions or a sibling walking past in the background.
Which Method is Better at Cheating Prevention
For someone whose passing the exam depends on cheating, they’ll find loopholes. We need to understand which of the methods can actually prevent cheating better.
Traditional Monitoring Works, well, on Traditional Methods: Typical webcams only show a slice of the room, allowing cheat sheets to be out of sight. Similarly, they can’t recognize a phone buzz that’s out of the frame. You can’t prevent this sort of cheating in traditional methods without a proctor.
The 360° Advantage of AI Proctoring: This is where AI – and especially modern 360-degree monitoring – leaves traditional oversight behind. With the help of a candidate’s webcam plus their smartphone camera, some platforms now offer a full, panoramic view of the room. That means “hiding” cyber-cheats is much harder. AI can also do an initial scan of the whole space, flagging suspicious items before the exam even starts.
Proctoring Set Up and Payments: The Practical Realities
This is essential to understand how tricky it can or can’t be to set up the entire proctoring system and how much it’ll cost.
The Real Cost of Human Monitoring
To run traditional monitoring for a university-level exam, you need lots of proctors, admin staff, training, and scheduling, even across time zones. As you scale up, costs go up too. Double your student numbers? You’ll probably need to double your human resources.
Why AI Scales (and Saves) So Well
AI proctoring is the definition of “scalable tech.” Once the system and software are set up, you can monitor as many people as you want. The system doesn’t mind. There’s an upfront cost, but as participation grows, the cost per student drops. The systems that work great are hybrid ones; AI is used first, and then humans review the odd cases. It can save a huge cost for global remote learning teams.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: Which proctoring approach is best for high-stakes certification exams?
A hybrid solution with 360-degree monitoring. It can handle both the volume and consistency with AI, while humans bring in the context and calm.
Q2: Does AI proctoring get rid of the need for live proctors?
No. The smartest systems let AI handle most routine monitoring and flag issues for a human to check.
Q3: What if a student loses their internet connection during an AI-proctored exam?
Good software saves the candidate’s progress as they go and lets them pick up where they left off.
To explore how our solutions can support your business objectives, Contact Us , Our team is here to assist you
